Criterion Month Day 27: Hedwig and the Angry Inch

Hedwig and the Angry Inch (2001)

A few weeks ago, I read John Cameron Mitchell was taking his film Hedwig and the Angry Inch on a tour of screenings for the film’s 25th anniversary. I wish I’d gone, but it’s tough going into something cold that’s been celebrated by so many people for so many years. Are fans going to sing along? Are there Rocky Horror Picture Show-esque traditions I need to know about?

I once took a film class where we watched The Rocky Horror Picture Show, and one guy did all the audience participation bits along with the movie. It was one of the most embarrassing movie-watching experiences I’ve ever had. On the other hand, I love it when films build a sense of community, especially when it’s a community of outsiders. And there’s no bigger outsider than Hedwig Robinson.

Continue reading

Criterion Month Day 26: Lone Star

Lone Star (1996)

For the longest time, I’d only ever seen two John Sayles movies. My first, weirdly enough, was the 2004 political satire Silver City, starring Chris Cooper as an inept Republican running for governor of Colorado. My dad thought it looked funny, this was the peak of the Daily Show, after all, but the film turned out to be far more serious and complex than my underdeveloped teenage brain was prepared for.

The second John Sayles movie I saw was what I imagine is his best-known film, Eight Men Out, about the 1919 Black Sox Scandal. Everybody likes a solid baseball movie, and it had some big names for the time, including John Cusack, Charlie Sheen, Christopher Lloyd, and John Mahoney.

And now I’ve seen three John Sayles movies. So what do I think?

Continue reading

Criterion Month Day 25: Boyz n the Hood

Boyz n the Hood (1991)

Film critics, especially the kind that make Important Lists, typically overcorrect for recency bias, which I respect. You can never be too sure something that seems groundbreaking now will still feel that way in a generation, and it’s just as easily to dismiss something that ends up being iconic. This Criterion Month I’ve been thinking about François Truffaut a lot and the importance of his debut, The 400 Blows. A towering achievement, especially as a directorial debut, Truffaut’s coming-of-age story is often discussed as one of the greatest films of all time.

Boyz n the Hood is older now than The 400 Blows was when Boyz n the Hood came out in 1991. I think that’s why Criterion recently released his Hood Trilogy box set, enough time has passed that you can talk about both these movies in the same breath. But what do I know? I just saw it. Maybe it’s too soon for me to be making declarations.

Continue reading

Criterion Month Day 24: Naked Lunch

Naked Lunch (1991)

Today marks the 12th time this site has covered David Cronenberg, who kids today might know from his chilling monologue on the latest Charli XCX album. Why do we feel the need to keep picking and prodding at the King of Body Horror and his many oozing orifices? One, because Canada’s favorite son has a whopping eight films in the Criterion Collection, and two, he makes a lot of creepy crawlies well suited for Shocktober every fall.

Continue reading

Criterion Month Day 23: Dogfight

Dogfight (1991)

It’s not a super abundant genre, but I do love a movie where two young romantics spend a night together and slowly start to develop an irresistible bond. From Before Sunrise to My Night at Maud’s to Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist, it’s just a really charming genre and one that taps into the idea that anything is possible when you’re young and naive and the night offers no expectations but a good time. Granted, I don’t recall any films in this genre that begin with one of the two romantic leads doing something really shitty to the other person and then spending the rest of the movie learning to be less of a jerk. Continue reading

Criterion Month Day 21: Sid and Nancy

Sid and Nancy (1986)

A few months ago, I noticed the 2022 FX show Pistol floating around Amazon Prime. I love punk and Danny Boyle (he directed every episode), so naturally I enjoyed it. Adapted primarily from guitarist Steve Jones’ autobiography, the show was criticized for falling into typical biopic pitfalls, overexplaining and simplifying events. Regardless, I loved the performances, the tone, and the frenetic sound and visual style of the show. It’s everything I could want in a Sex Pistols biopic.

Sid and Nancy is everything I don’t want in a Sex Pistols biopic.

Continue reading